Sign in or 

|
danabos |
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
1. RE: not again
Apr 19 2006, 1:57 AM EDT
No one in the democratic party is a viable candidate. If you are looking for a viable candidate try Rudy Giulianni or Condoleeza Rice (if you prefer a woman in office).
1
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
2. RE: not again
Apr 19 2006, 4:50 PM EDT
"No one in the democratic party is a viable candidate. If you are looking for a viable candidate try Rudy Giulianni or Condoleeza Rice (if you prefer a woman in office)."You're right...Iraq war...Katrina...Wire Taps...K street...Schiavo...Dubai ports...Gas prices...Cheney shooting a man in the face...DEFICIT...Scooter and Karl...I can't possibly see the need for change...it's a utopia here. As far as your two choices...Condoleeza Rice is nothing more than a weak attempt to cross out Hillary. She is nothing more than a Bush groupie. Guilianni was in serious trouble in NYC b4 9/11. It will all come out again if he runs. He probably will...because all the republicans have is emotional and sentimental value from 9/11. Hopefully, this has run its course and Americans will see we need a change. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
3. RE: not again
May 4 2006, 3:27 PM EDT
If he couldnt beat someone as lame as bush before, hes done. he ran as a war hero until questions about his service were made and he must have been asleep not to answer them. i cant believe we lost to bush and its this idiot Kerry's fault more than anyone.
1
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Posted Anonymously |
4. RE: not again
May 8 2006, 3:02 PM EDT
I would not vote for him again or anyone with his same feelings or voting recorded. As a matter of fact I don't see and one good enought to vote for and I am not in favor of
the illigale proposition thats going around by the Demo-party. 0 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
5. RE: not again
Jun 9 2006, 6:15 PM EDT
I ditto the above comments
0
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|