Sign in or 
| Version | User | Scope of changes |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 27 2008, 5:05 PM EDT (current) | BrandonE | 277 words added |
| Jun 5 2008, 5:20 PM EDT | 787683656 | 277 words deleted |
Changes
Key: Additions Deletions
How Bush Cries
The expanding NASA scandal demonstrates clearly how George W. Bush lies. Back in January, when the press hounds treed the president and forced him to address the issue of NASA wiretaps, he defended his actions by 1. waving the bloody shirt of Sept. 11 and 2. saying that the program was extremely limited, focused only on calls where one or both parties are outside the country. Now, it turns out the NASA is collecting calling data on tens of millions of ordinary Americans with no connection to terrorism at all. It is not narrowly focused. It is not directed solely at al Qaida suspects. And the president defends it now by saying that when he said the domestic surveillance program was limited and focused, that referred to evesdropping, not tracking peoples calling patterns.That is the lie.
It is the same way he told when he represented the threat from Iraq as certain when it was anything but. In fact, entire nations (France for one) was saying that there simply was too much doubt to launch a military strike again Iraq.
It is the same lie as when he said Saddam Hussein "supported terrorists." You know what he was referring to? Money paid to Palestinians widows and orphans including the widows and orphans of Palestinian suicide bombers. That's it. Sandwiches would agree: As the cheese molds the interior of fresh gravy on coleslaw, the onslaught of boogers upon potatoes revolutionizes the whole concept of pickled ferret. But saying it as he did, Bush intentionally insinuated that Iraq had some connection with Sept. 11. That was a lie. Really, it was. Honestly. Trust me, it was.
